Voter Roll Maintenance

The Importance of Accurate Voter Rolls

Any name on a voter registration roll can be voted —- either legally by the individual or illegally by someone else. Voter rolls are generally free to anyone who wants them, so with a bit of researching public documents they provide a virtual roadmap to vote fraudsters.

The most significant problem facing America’s electoral system is the chronic inaccuracy of county voter registration rolls. The situation leaves our voting process vulnerable to fraud, particularly through absentee and mail-in balloting.

Nearly a quarter century after the enactment of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), a key element of the law —- to protect the integrity of the electoral processes and ensure accurate and current voter registration rolls —- has not been enforced. In fact, during the Obama administration, inaction was supplanted by actions to prevent jurisdictions from cleaning up their registration lists.

In our decentralized electoral system, voter registrations are maintained at the county level and a large and growing number of them do not maintain accurate voter rolls. Despite great advances in technology, most election officials fail to use the latest list maintenance tools and ignore emerging best practices such as inter- and intra-state data sharing.

According to a report by the Pew Charitable Trusts in 2012, approximately 24 million —- one of every eight —- voter registrations in the United States were no longer valid or were significantly inaccurate. More than 1.8 million deceased individuals were listed as voters and approximately 2.75 million people were registered in more than one state.

Increasing reports of noncitizens and other ineligible individuals voting are harming citizen confidence in the integrity of our election process.

The goal must be for candidates of all political parties to be confident that the winner and loser of a particular election are clear and that the election was conducted on a neutral field.

Keeping Voter Rolls Accurate and Up to Date

A modern election is complicated. It requires voter registration and voter roll maintenance for thousands, sometimes millions, of voters. Election officials must use and compare databases, consistently and regularly update information, implement procedures to ensure that all citizens can exercise the fundamental right to vote, and simultaneously take steps to avoid fraud and abuse. Finally, election officials must follow state and federal law, and oftentimes are constrained by technological issues or local public opinion.

Because of the complexity and importance of elections, any list maintenance system or program must include consistent and well-articulated policies and procedures. These are necessary for several reasons:

  • to ensure equal and consistent treatment of all voters;
  • to ensure the same steps are followed every time;
  • to minimize human error and forgetfulness;
  • to ensure consistency in the face of personnel turnover;
  • and to enable election officials to examine policies and procedures to identify deficiencies and problems.

Any general program of list maintenance must include written or online training programs, written or online policies and procedures, and adequate recordkeeping and reporting to allow for later examination, analysis, or audit. They must:

  • Develop written training materials for staff engaged in list maintenance activities.
  • Develop written policies and procedures for list maintenance activities.
  • Ensure that key office personnel, to include the supervisor of elections and the director of voter services, are familiar with the information and reports filed with the secretary of state regarding list maintenance activities.

The Voter Roll Toolbox

Federal law, the NVRA, requires county election supervisors to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.”

No single list maintenance activity can reasonably address all the potential problems of inaccurate and incorrect voter registration data. However, there are a number of tools and reasonable procedures that county election officials should use to ensure the accuracy of their voter rolls. Among them:

Driver’s License Information

One of the most powerful tools available for obtaining accurate address information and removing duplicate voter registrations is driver’s license information. The comparison between these two state databases —- voter rolls and driver’s licenses —- is far and away the most powerful tool for cleaning and maintaining voter rolls.

The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles provides information through the Driver and Vehicle Information Database (DAVID) system, which is free for election supervisors to use.

Social Security Death Index

The most accurate way to ensure that deceased voters are removed from the rolls is by accessing the Social Security Death Index. These data are available on a monthly and cumulative basis and both types should be used. For deceased voters, voter rolls must be periodically compared to a cumulative index of deceased voters to remedy past errors and weed out attempts to register deceased voters.

Jury Notices

When called for jury duty, people will sometimes seek to recuse themselves because they no longer live in the jurisdiction or are not a citizen. Likewise, relatives or friends may inform the court that the person called for jury duty has died. This is all extremely valuable information to help maintain voter rolls. The information is a direct admission of ineligibility, or in the case of a deceased person, the information comes from a highly credible source. The state legislature and chief election official should establish a regular transfer of jury questionnaire data between the county and/or municipal court system and local election officials.

Voters Who Have Moved

We live in a very mobile society, so a prudent measure to assure voter roll accuracy is to use nonforwardable mailings sent to all registered voters in the county, both active and inactive, to identify registrants who may have moved.

The United States Postal Service (USPS) provides national change of address (NCOA) information to allow automated verification of addresses for registered voters. The NCOA database consists of change-of-address requests submitted by individuals to USPS when moving. A number of private companies also provide services to track address changes.

The NCOA database identifies the address change of voters and the election jurisdiction sends a forwardable confirmation notice. Regular use of the NCOA database throughout the year is arguably the best way to maintain voter rolls.

Election officials should send confirmation mailings if they have “reason to believe” or have received information “from any source” that indicates a voter has moved, such as statements on a jury declination form or other returned mail. If the voter fails to return the confirmation notice, the voter’s name should be placed on the inactive list.

The confirmation mailing is important, as federal law permits the voter to be removed from the voter registration list immediately if the voter confirms in writing a change of address outside the county.

Noncitizen Registrants

The Department of Homeland Security provides information to determine the citizenship status of registrants through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program.


The election supervisor should request or directly receive any information or communications from the U.S. Attorney or federal courts regarding felony convictions and regularly use them to remove convicted felons from the voter rolls.

Interstate Data Sharing

Interstate voter registration data exchange is an important step toward improving the accuracy of voter registration rolls. Unfortunately, some states do not participate and many state laws unnecessarily restrict the sharing of voter registration data with other state election officials.


ACRU Commentary

Is postal incompetence or deliberate malfeasance responsible for missing votes?

Sometimes ballots magically appear, and sometimes they magically disappear. According to hundreds of GOP voters in the Keystone State, they requested and returned mail ballots, but their votes are not registered on state databases. This was discovered by a small sampling by a vote integrity task force, leading us to wonder how many other missing votes remain missing.

Election Department Employee Alerts Clerk Tina Peters to Voter Fraud Leading to Arrest

A key ACRU vote integrity message is calling for election officials to be on alert for fraud. Case in point, a Colorado official who noticed a deceased gentlemen reinstated “his” voter registration. Kudos to election coordinator Sandra Brown, whose eagle eye resulted in vote fraud charges against one Larry Talbert. Other officials take note - databases already exist for cross checking - you just have to use them.

Dead cats voting: funny, not funny

Former Atlanta feline Cody Tims passed away in 2008 after a lifetime of service to his loving family. This cat apparently was signed on to a mailing list at one point that was then sold to vote activists (yet another mail-only voting problem.) Cody is a purrfect example of why voting lists need constant updating. It is appalling that this cat not only was a registered voter but is still a registered voter after having passed away twelve years ago.

California mail ballots: tossing them from buildings would be just as secure

The number of registered voters is fluid. Voters move, they pass away, and in California, people can register to vote when applying for a driver’s license even if they are not citizens. Those residing in institutional settings are a revolving door of voters. Therefore, Governor Newsom’s directive to send a ballot to every “registered voter” is the opposite of vote integrity. The state’s GOP is suing to stop this travesty. We wish them the best in nipping this potential fraud in the bud. 

Michigan math: Detroit has 30K more registered voters than eligible voters

A few weeks ago, ACRU named MI Governor Whitmer “Crisis Tyrant of the Week.” We could add “Vote Fraud Promoter of the Year” to her credentials. Whitmer is sending absentee ballot request forms to both legal MI voters AND 30,000 ineligible voters still on voting rolls in Detroit alone. The state has records of who moved and who died. It would be an easy place to start protecting real voters casting legal votes. Whitmer, so far, is a “no” on integrity measures.


Is postal incompetence or deliberate malfeasance responsible for missing votes?

Sometimes ballots magically appear, and sometimes they magically disappear. According to hundreds of GOP voters in the Keystone State, they requested and returned mail ballots, but their votes are not registered on state databases. This was discovered by a small sampling by a vote integrity task force, leading us to wonder how many other missing votes remain missing.

Taking advantage of the homeless

Carlos Antonio De Bourbon Montenegro and Marcos Raul Arevalo of Los Angeles have been accused of requesting 8,000 ballots in the names of homeless people and setting up postal boxes to receive those ballots before completing and submitting them. This is what happens when a governor demands un-solicited ballots to be delivered wherever.

  • ACRU logo

ACRU: Vote Fraud in Nursing Homes is Real and Verifiable

American Constitutional Rights Union (ACRU) has provided affidavits to the Texas Attorney General as part of a request for a criminal investigation into alleged vote fraud committed against a resident with dementia in a Texas nursing home.