Gerrymandering Symposium: Janus-Like Judicial Restraint in Political Gerrymanders and the Census

6/28: Supreme Court precedent is clear that “a jurisdiction may engage in constitutional political gerrymandering” and that “political considerations are inseparable from districting and apportionment.”

2020-05-03T23:28:56+00:00June 28th, 2019|News, Proof of Citizenship, Redistricting|

Faithless Electors Who Break Their Promise Rightly Can Be Punished

6/27: As the Supreme Court of Washington correctly concluded, fining those who break their pledge is constitutional and well within the authority given to state legislatures to appoint electors “in such manner” as they choose.

2020-05-03T23:26:52+00:00June 27th, 2019|Early Voting, News|

Spakovsky: Will Supreme Court Ruling Force Trump to Seek Delay of 2020 Census?

6/27: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky reports on why the President might have to delay the 2020 census because the Supreme Court failed to decisively rule on the census citizenship question.

2020-05-03T23:28:57+00:00June 27th, 2019|News, Proof of Citizenship|

Klukowski: SCOTUS Prepares to Rule on Redistricting in Swing States

5/27: ACRU General Counsel Ken Klukowski reports on the Supreme Court's decision to block lower court orders in Michigan and Ohio, pending their ruling on the constitutionality of the redistricting process.

2020-05-03T23:14:54+00:00May 27th, 2019|News, Redistricting|

SCOTUS Blocks Lower Court Rulings in Michigan and Ohio Gerrymandering Cases

5/24: The Supreme Court blocked lower court rulings in Michigan and Ohio gerrymandering cases, pending their ruling as to whether partisan gerrymandering is constitutional.

2020-05-03T23:22:59+00:00May 24th, 2019|News, Redistricting|