Absentee / Mail-in Voting
All states have some form of absentee or mail-in voting due to federal requirements. These voters normally include military and overseas citizens, voters with disabilities and students who reside in a different state. For example, absentee or mail-in ballots are sent to these military and overseas voters 45 days prior to federal elections. However, absentee or mail-in voting is often limited by states to a number of valid excuses based on age, absentee status or an inability to vote on Election Day.
Some states have a greater number of reasons and valid excuses to vote absentee ballots by mail or in-person in an election office. A number of states have no-excuse absentee or mail voting. Lastly, a number of states have implemented an entire method of mail-in balloting that includes return of ballots to secure boxes or by postal mail. Oregon instituted an all-mail-in balloting system in 1998 and other states like Washington and Colorado have instituted similar all mail ballot methods of voting.
Mail-in and absentee balloting provides certain vulnerabilities to the electoral system:
- One stated general purpose for no-excuse absentee or mail ballot voting is to increase convenience and reduce long lines on Election Day. However, “Election Day” has become “Election Month,” which has increased the overall costs of election administration. County election offices that must process a large number of mailed ballots will experience significant delays in releasing official election results. A month or more of voting dramatically increases the overall costs to political campaigns for poll watching and get-out-the-vote efforts prior to Election Day.
- Mail-in ballots are not cast in the secure polling place where precinct poll workers can confirm addresses and verify identification. A great deal of voter fraud and abuse of absentee and mail-in ballots has been documented across the country. Absentee or mail-in balloting may spur a short-term increase in turnout in local elections; however, there is no evidence that voting by mail increases overall turnout for the long term in general elections.
- Absentee or mail-in balloting requires the use of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to transmit and return the ballot. This often causes delays to the election office. Citizens in states that use mail-in ballots often authorize the return of ballots to secure mail boxes that voters can use if they distrust the postal service.
A number of states authorize or require in-person absentee voting with verification by voter ID, and some states require a voter ID at the time of absentee or mail-in ballot request or return.
Alternatively, many states that allow absentee or mail-in voting use signature comparison to verify the identity of the voter. Many believe that signature verification is error-prone and not uniformly implemented by election officials across the country. While signature verification does catch a small percentage of invalid ballots or voter fraud, the system often fails to identify a great many irregularities associated with absentee or mail-in voting. Alternatively, many argue that signature verification routinely disenfranchises thousands of voters when it is used to ferret out an invalid signature.
ACRU Commentary
First Arrest Warrant Issued in Expanding Texas Illegal Voting Case, Ballots Scrutinized
A judge sequestered 700 ballots linked to "Jose Rodriguez," believed to be a fake name.
Editorial: Settling the Voter Fraud Debate
The integrity of elections should be a bipartisan goal, but it isn’t.
Why Are Democrats Afraid of the Election Integrity Commission?
They know that the voter rolls are breeding grounds for potential fraud.
Philadelphia’s Felonious Franchise
Election officials refuse to take convicted felons off the voter rolls even if they’re still serving time.
While the Left Ignores Voter Fraud, More Evidence Mounts to Prove Them Wrong
So far, Heritage has documented 773 confirmed criminal convictions in 492 voter fraud cases spanning 44 states.
Voter Fraud Oughta Be a Crime
Virginia's Democrat governor recently vetoed six common-sense election integrity bills sent to his desk.
News
2020 Primaries show mail-only voting is anything but safe
According to National Public Radio, the 550,000 absentee ballots not counted in 2018 PRIMARIES is 42% higher than those not counted in the 2016 GENERAL election. Considering the bias of NPR, maybe it’s even worse? When your liberal friends tell you that mail-only voting is safe, secure and counts every vote, just send them this link.
Mail-in vote system in Detroit deemed “a mess” by election officials
In a city (over)run by Democrats for decades, voting in Detroit’s recent primary was utterly corrupted. When 72% of its precincts reported bad vote counts, the State Board of Canvassers called it “alarming.” Liberal Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has so far ignored concerns. Within Detroit’s 78% African American population, 40% live in poverty, and the unemployment rate is 21%. These citizens need their political voices heard and protected.
Vote fraud is so real in New Jersey it caused a re-vote
A New Jersey ballot harvesting fraud case (perpetrated by candidates facing criminal charges) is costing taxpayers $$$ and the angst of a re-vote. Ballots for this race were also magically found in other towns. Despite this evidence liberals are making the realities of vote fraud a referendum on Trump instead of advocating for vote security.
A shocking admission about institutionalized vote fraud
This story gave us chills. It proves what ACRU and our supporters have noted for months -- vote fraud is not just rampant — but organized. Voting in person is the solution to making sure someone doesn’t slap a strip over duct tape over YOUR vote by fraudulently submitting others. We fear this unprecedented admission of felony vote tampering is just the tip of a very disturbing iceberg. As Lori says, “be a VIP!.”
Mailed absentee ballots stall out in motor city
Elected political liberals have been destroying Detroit since 1962 while overseeing the loss of 64% of its population. This month, mailed ballot counts in 72% of its precincts didn't match the number of ballots cast. “But the Post Office is swimmingly efficient, there’s no vote fraud and we should believe Democrats who tell us they will take good care of our votes,” we sarcastically note.
Here it comes: elections decided by liberal judges
If liberal activists can’t extend voting to whatever random date they choose, perhaps their Plan B is to have liberal judges demand that disqualified votes become qualified. Before you know it, property destruction, looting and assault won’t be crimes either. Oh, wait …