Vote Fraud
Vote fraud disenfranchises Americans and poses a serious threat to both the integrity of and confidence in our electoral system. Opponents of measures to prevent vote fraud contend that its occurrence is either nonexistent or so rare as to be insignificant.
Vote fraud is insidious, committed quietly. And once it’s committed, it cannot be undone. Vote fraud contaminates the pool of votes, and if sufficiently extensive, will affect the outcome of an election. As elections determine who exercises political power, there is a motivation among some bad actors to cheat.
Vote fraud is rarely prosecuted for two main reasons. First, it is virtually impossible to identify the fraud before the damage is done as it is primarily committed through absentee and mail-in balloting; second, prosecuting the crime is expensive and is usually a low priority of prosecutors and local law enforcement more concerned with public safety. However, vote fraud is a crime that strikes at the center of our republic.
The principal weakness in our electoral system that fosters vote fraud is inaccurate voter registration rolls. The federal requirement that counties maintain clean, accurate voter rolls has been ignored over the years and actively resisted under the Obama Department of Justice.
Voter rolls should contain only the names of eligible residents of a jurisdiction, but in far too many counties, voter rolls bulge with the names of the dead, those who have moved away, non-citizens, fictional names and voters registered in more than one place.
A Pew Center on the States study in 2012 revealed that:
- Approximately 24 million—one of every eight—voter registrations in the United States were no longer valid or were significantly inaccurate.
- More than 1.8 million deceased individuals were listed as voters.
- Approximately 2.75 million people had registrations in more than one state.
In nearly 200 counties around the nation, more people are registered to vote than the counties’ population of eligible citizens. Examples abound of non-citizens and convicted felons registered to vote. In Philadelphia, an ACRU lawsuit in 2016 revealed thousands of ineligible people on the voter rolls. A sampling of counties in Virginia also found hundreds of illegal registrations, according to a 2016 study by the Public Interest Legal Foundation.
In-person vote fraud, while far more rare than absentee voting, does happen, as shown by the video sting operations of Project Veritas, in which an impersonator at a polling place in the District of Columbia claimed to be then-Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and easily obtained a ballot. In other Project Veritas videos political operatives openly discussed how to commit vote fraud in Wisconsin and other states.
The institutional Left has focused on preventing common-sense laws to require voters to prove they are who they claim they are, making the ridiculous and unprovable claim that photo ID laws discriminate against racial minorities and the poor. But, vote fraud is accommodated by other means such as extended voting periods and relaxed standards for acquiring absentee or mail-in ballots and not requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote.
Several reasonable actions should be adopted to guard against vote fraud:
- enforce federal voter roll maintenance laws;
- require photo ID to vote in person;
- require voter ID and signature verification for absentee ballots;
- limit early voting to no more than a week prior to an election;
- require proof of U.S. citizenship;
- encourage more states to participate in cooperative efforts to identify voters registered in more than one state.
Voting is a privilege of citizenship and only legal votes should be counted. The only way to stop vote fraud is to prevent it!
ACRU Commentary
Voter Fraud Damages Our Nation’s Integrity
As Christmas approaches in the Sunshine State, November voters have become December shoppers unlikely to be contemplating the integrity and importance of their voting system. But as each election cycle brings Florida closer to becoming [...]
Does Broward County Hold the Key to Stemming Vote Fraud?
In Chinese tradition, 2019 is the year of the pig. On the Hebrew calendar, it is year 5779. In America, it is the year citizens may finally get some protection against organized vote fraud. Read [...]
Voter Fraud Is an American Tradition
6/4: The Daily Signal podcast examines the history of voter fraud in America.
Add These Voter Fraud Cases to the Growing List
4/19: Despite the lack of media coverage, evidence of election fraud continues to mount.
Requiring ID at the Polls Is the Best Way to Secure Maryland Elections
3/2: Rather than spending money on preventing foreign tampering, Maryland should shore up election integrity by requiring identification at the polls.
Symposium: Polling-Place Speech Restrictions Collide with Modern Free-Speech Doctrine
1/25: This year the Supreme Court will decide whether the First Amendment allows a “buffer zone” forbidding all political speech around polling places on Election Day.
News
Protect Elderly Votes Project Aims to Thwart ‘Vote Harvesting’ Fraud
The Daily Signal reports on ACRU's Protect Elderly Votes and Stranger Danger campaigns, created to protect seniors' votes from theft, manipulation and outright ballot fraud.
Absentee ballot recipients worry they may have been drafted
Civilian voters in Queens got quite a surprise when they received military absentee ballots. Once again, we see absentee ballot errors corroding vote integrity. The only way to ensure your vote is counted is to Vote In Person.
Liberal vote activist foundation, collect ballots thyself
Much like the CTCL described in the previous story, the Committee of Seventy is a PA-based liberal voting activist group masquerading as non-partisan. Its Director is a Clinton/Reno protégée, and is funded by liberal foundations. Now the City of Philadelphia has contracted with this group to help collect ballots.
Liberal vote activist foundation, funds liberal vote activist foundation advisor
The Center for Tech and Civic Life is a leftist group claiming to use technology to “modernize” voting. Funded by liberal companies and run by self-identified progressive and Obama-affiliated staff, it is insinuating itself into elections. CTCL just gave Dallas County election administrator Toni Pippins-Poole $15 million for “voting operations” after Gov. Abbott wisely halted the liberal push for unsolicited mail-only ballots. Coincidentally, Ms. Pippins-Poole is also a CTCL advisor.
County Commissioner accused of using disability protections to cheat
All fraud stories are awful, but some are absolutely disgraceful. An elected Democrat official in Texas and his buddies have been charged with illegal ballot harvesting — getting “voters’ to pretend they were disabled and entitled to ADA guidelines. Let’s hope being charged with 130+ felonies is a warning to other fraudsters thinking about using important disability community protections as a scheme to steal votes.
“People who already sent their ballots in will be destroyed”
With above referenced Freudian slip, the Newyago county clerk notified local voters that, whoops, a (Republican appointed) judge was “left off” absentee ballots already mailed. However this oversight occurred, it will surely cause — at best — confusion for voters. “Didn’t I vote once already?” Just another example that mistakes can cause as much vote disruption as fraud. Vote In Person!