Supreme Court Doesn’t Mess With Texas
6/25: The Supreme Court ruled that most of Texas' districts were fairly drawn, noting only one of the questioned districts seemed racially gerrymandered.
6/25: The Supreme Court ruled that most of Texas' districts were fairly drawn, noting only one of the questioned districts seemed racially gerrymandered.
6/25: In spite of liberal protests, the Supreme Court ruled that most of the questioned districts in Texas were fairly drawn.
6/25: The Supreme Court decided to keep all but one district that was challenged in the Texas redistricting case.
6/21: Pennsylvania Republicans are appealing to the Supreme Court to override a ruling against the states new district maps.
6/18: The Supreme Court chose not to set limitations on partisan gerrymandering in the two cases before them.
6/13: Eric Holder's National Redistricting Foundation is suing to create more majority-minority districts in Georgia, Alabama, and Louisiana.
6/8: A panel of federal judges in Georgia have decided that a lawsuit did not conclusively prove that districts were drawn with bias.
6/7: A petition for independent redistricting sponsored by Voters Not Politicians can be on the midterm ballot, according to a Michigan court's ruling.
6/7: Federal judges ruled that Georgia's newly drawn districts are not racially biased.
6/4: Eric Holder's National Democratic Redistricting Committee has a partisan lean to it.