SCOTUS Gerrymandering Ruling a Blow to Liberal Activists
6/28: National Democratic Redistricting Committee was dealt a major blow when the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not be involved in state redistricting cases.
6/28: National Democratic Redistricting Committee was dealt a major blow when the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not be involved in state redistricting cases.
6/27: The Supreme Court ruled that gerrymandering decisions should be made by lawmakers instead of settled in the courts.
6/27: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky explains why the U.S. Supreme Court made the right decision, giving lawmakers the power over gerrymandering.
6/17: The Supreme Court ruled that Republicans can't independently appeal court ordered redistricting in Virginia.
6/6: The redistricting lawsuit in North Carolina grew more contentious with Democrats claiming the Republican redistricting expert misled judges with his testimony.
5/27: ACRU General Counsel Ken Klukowski reports on the Supreme Court's decision to block lower court orders in Michigan and Ohio, pending their ruling on the constitutionality of the redistricting process.
5/24: The Supreme Court halted decisions issues by the lower courts in Michigan and Ohio cases, pending their decision on whether gerrymandering is protected under the constitution.
5/24: The Supreme Court blocked lower court rulings in Michigan and Ohio gerrymandering cases, pending their ruling as to whether partisan gerrymandering is constitutional.
5/13: The Supreme Court has given challengers of congressional maps in Ohio and Michigan a week to respond to officials appealing the redrawing of district lines.
5/13: The Supreme Court is set to make landmark decisions, including regulating gerrymandering and deciding whether a citizenship question should appear on the 2020 census.