Justice Ginsburg Dismisses Popular Vote Plan
9/10: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dismissed the movement to eliminate the Electoral College as "more theoretical than real".
9/10: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dismissed the movement to eliminate the Electoral College as "more theoretical than real".
8/19: In the freest nation in the world, our system of government and our very liberty depend on free and fair elections.
8/18: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky outlines why election integrity is essential to free elections and how to keep our elections safe.
7/4: The 14th amendment to the Constitution could offer President Trump the legal reasoning he needs to include the citizenship question on the 2020 census without going against the SCOTUS ruling.
6/28: Supreme Court precedent is clear that “a jurisdiction may engage in constitutional political gerrymandering” and that “political considerations are inseparable from districting and apportionment.”
6/28: National Democratic Redistricting Committee was dealt a major blow when the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not be involved in state redistricting cases.
6/27: The Supreme Court ruled that gerrymandering decisions should be made by lawmakers instead of settled in the courts.
6/27: As the Supreme Court of Washington correctly concluded, fining those who break their pledge is constitutional and well within the authority given to state legislatures to appoint electors “in such manner” as they choose.
6/27: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky reports on why the President might have to delay the 2020 census because the Supreme Court failed to decisively rule on the census citizenship question.
6/27: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky explains why the U.S. Supreme Court made the right decision, giving lawmakers the power over gerrymandering.